tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4079934161985715000.post5040066563584647743..comments2023-07-23T17:04:05.956+02:00Comments on The frog that jumped out: Touching a raw nerve with the anti-science tribe: Lawrence Torcello on climate misinformationUgo Bardihttp://www.blogger.com/profile/18231859786466899924noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4079934161985715000.post-80528242915049829802014-03-24T15:57:45.564+01:002014-03-24T15:57:45.564+01:00Dear professor, in the italian counterpart of this...Dear professor, in the italian counterpart of this article I have placed reference to Boschi's (forme INGV president) version about the L'Aquila affair. <br /><br />Any comment would be appreciated.<br /><br />Regards<br />Phitionoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4079934161985715000.post-44961116540941838722014-03-22T08:53:47.831+01:002014-03-22T08:53:47.831+01:00:-):-)Ugo Bardihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18231859786466899924noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4079934161985715000.post-3634063157868990202014-03-21T17:57:19.932+01:002014-03-21T17:57:19.932+01:00This Tortello guy is a philosopher so I’m trying t...This Tortello guy is a philosopher so I’m trying to reproduce his bizarre logic.<br /><br />For example: ‘Misinformation about climate is criminally negligent.<br />There are those who fund climate misinformation. Therefore those who<br />fund climate misinformation are criminally negligent.’ ....No that’s not<br />valid.<br /><br />How about: ‘Misinformation about climate is criminally negligent.<br />Everyone provides climate misinformation from time to time. Therefore<br />everyone is criminally negligent from time to time.’ ...No that’s not valid<br />either.<br /><br />Can someone help me out here?<br /><br />klemAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com