Strategies of Communication on Climate Change
Showing posts with label media lies. Show all posts
Showing posts with label media lies. Show all posts
Tuesday, September 10, 2013
The beauty of propaganda
Posted by
Ugo Bardi
First of all, note that the "Mail" sells almost two million copies per day. Consider also that other newspapers reported the same news. Then note the more than 156.000 Web shares and the over one thousand comments.
So, several million people have been exposed to the idea that "global cooling is coming" and to the parallel one that "the Arctic is recovering"
Now, consider how many people may have had the time and the willingness to go see the real data; for instance here, or here, showing that the Arctic is NOT recovering. Maybe a few thousand people? A few tens of thousands? Hardly more than that. So, you can imagine which message the public is getting.
You see the beauty of propaganda? Volume always triumphs over truth.
Monday, September 9, 2013
The Arctic ice disaster
Posted by
Ugo Bardi
By all means an impressive presentation of the Arctic ice disaster. But, alas, it has only some 55,000 views on Youtube - that is nearly nothing.
At the same time, the "Daily Mirror" and the "Telegraph" are aggressively proclaiming, once more, that sea ice is "recovering" (see here for a discussion of what is really happening).
So, while the planet's ice keeps melting, we are swamped by lies that fill the available media space. How are we going to let the truth out?
________________________________
BTW, in order to debunk this new tsunami of lies, you may wish to note from the clip above that the amount of ice in 1979 was 16855 km3. According to the available data, today we have lost almost 14000 km3 of ice from that date. Now, the difference between the August volumes in 2012 and 2013 is about 1400 km3. So, we lost 14000 and we gained 1400: that's what they call "recovery"????
The point is that there is so little ice left in the Arctic ocean that a small fluctuation may appear as a large effect, but in absolute terms it is not. Motivated reasoning, anyone?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)