Guest post by Max Iacono
…that is, the Seven Main Power and Policy development and implementation “Complexes” which run Human Society here on Happy Planet Earth and are preventing serious action on both Climate Change and regarding the many issues and problems deriving from Limits to Growth on a finite planet, while at the same time also creating numerous additional ones nearly as serious (though perhaps not quite) ….
Max Iacono discusses the powers that rule the Earth and prevent the necessary change
…that is, the Seven Main Power and Policy development and implementation “Complexes” which run Human Society here on Happy Planet Earth and are preventing serious action on both Climate Change and regarding the many issues and problems deriving from Limits to Growth on a finite planet, while at the same time also creating numerous additional ones nearly as serious (though perhaps not quite) ….
I believe there are seven main
such “Power and Policy” “Complexes”
which shape and determine policies and outcomes in the United States and
elsewhere in the Western “democracies”. And although somewhat differently, also in countries like Russia and China
and other… “emerging countries”. (and incidentally in what sense can a country with a more than 5000 year history be considered to be "emerging"...as it often is referred to?)
One of these has been quite well-known
for a very long time, ever since U.S. President Eisenhower warned about its
dangers, and it is:
1) The Military-Industrial
Complex ;
The other major ones are:
2) The Fossil Fuels Complex; i.e. so-called “Big Oil “ and “Big
Coal”;
3) The Finance and Banking Complex; Wall Street, the City of London and the big investment banks
e.g. Goldman Sachs, J.P. Morgan Chase, Deutsche Bank and others;
4) The Agro-Industry & Food, and the Pharmaceuticals & Medical Complex; e.g. Cargill, Nestle, Monsanto, ConAgra, and Archer Daniels Midland...and Johnson & Johnson, Pfizer,
Merck & Co. and Eli Lilly and many other such companies from other western
countries. These two industries also
could be listed separately but I am listing them together as one overall
complex because they are two sides of the same coin, namely the coin of food & human
nutrition and “health”. To put it
“humorously” one is made sick by having the wrong kind of diet and nutrition and
eating junk foods, and one is then “cured” by a plethora of mostly useless and
dangerous medicines including also some dangerous and avoidable medical procedures. (although
this phenomenon occurs not only at the individual level but also at the
societal level)
5) The National “Security” Complex; the NSA and the rest of the
so-called intelligence community;
6) The Mainstream Ideology and Mainstream Culture Complex, the Mainstream Media, Madison avenue,
parts of Mainstream Academia, Hollywood and a number of other components. A very important component of ideology
and culture which is present and is typically operating at all levels and
sectors in all societies is made up of the main and the lesser religions; these
include the three main monotheistic religions, the main eastern religions,
indigenous religions and the new religious movements, and the many sects or
offshoots of each.
7) Other Complexes corresponding to other major -though lesser-
industries and sectors for different countries
e.g. the Tobacco Industry ;
How should we think of such
Complexes and in what sense is the word “complex” being used?
Basically all the Complexes are led
by the particular Industry and its industry and business associations and
involve forms of collusion and cooperation (often tacit and invisible) between:
a) the industry and its many
corporations, contractors and sub-contractors
b) the particular national government and its state apparatus
(the executive branch and its ministers and the state bureaucracy and its heads
and senior management; the legislative branch, parliaments and parliamentary
committees, who draft or pass laws and determine budgetary appropriations and
policies; and the judicial branch
and its court decisions as well as regulatory agencies and the respective
industry regulatory frameworks which they oversee or administer);
c) the scientific and academic, and the applied
and commercial, research communities;
d) the media community and the advertising and marketing community;
e) industry business and professional
associations; and
f) a very wide
assortment of lobbyists of various kinds operating and moving throughout the
complex and acting as catalysts and facilitators, (playing a range of advisory
and promotional and other roles)
but who also are direct beneficiaries; and finally...
g) international public organizations / institutions -such
as the IMF and the World Bank, and the WTO or the World Intellectual Property
Organization and some of the UN specialized agencies- which also sometimes play
some higher order “system maintenance or extension or furthering” roles.
The main purpose of any one of
these Complexes is to make sure that the policies -governmental and public policies,
and private sector / corporate policies and strategies both national and
international- which are implemented will result in greater profits for the
particular industry and its companies or other entities and for the owners and
managers of the Complex, including also greater “compensation” for the various
executives. (and of course also the facilitating lobbyists who help to
“lubricate” the system and keep it all in good working order) . And this regardless of the costs or harm resulting to the public and the citizens of various countries -and to the global or local environment-.
These executives as well as some of the
lobbyists also typically rotate between the various components and
organizations of the overall complex in the course of their careers thereby
giving The Complex greater staying power and resiliency and continuity and
consistency and also (real) “sustainability” .
The specific components of each
Complex and their dynamics and operations vary somewhat from Complex to
Complex. But their purpose
and their basic “strategic and operational formulas” or mechanisms -though they
are more organic and network-like than mechanical- are the same, or are at least very similar.
The links below provide good
descriptions and illustrations of each of the Seven Main Complexes. As mentioned above there also exist
a number of other ones which also can differ from country to country. And there also are of course (many) other descriptions and
explanations of what they are and how they function in addition to the ones I have
listed (identified) below only for illustration purposes:
1) The Military Industrial Complex:
many others
and they are mostly interlinked)
2) The Fossil
Fuels Complex:
(Bill
McKibben had just published “Global Warming’s Terrifying New
Math” at Rolling
Stone. And the above was a response by
David Schwartzman)
iv) The companies most responsible for climate change: here
iv) The companies most responsible for climate change: here
3) The Finance
and Banking Complex:
4) The Agro Industry and Food, and the Pharmaceutical and Medical
Complexes:
i)
An in-depth description of how the various components of this particular
complex work
together to produce certain policies and “health”
outcomes: here
And
specifically the book’s chapter 13: Understanding the System; Chapter
14: Research and
Profit; Chapter 15: Media Matters; Chapter 16: Government Misinformation; Chapter 18:
Blinded by the Light Bringers.
In
generic terms the preceding chapters describe how the other Complexes
work as well. The
interactive formula
of various players and what
they do and how they accomplish it is very
similar if not precisely the
same.
5) The National
Security Complex:
6) The Ideology and Culture Complex:
Egyptian, Mexican and Turkish soap opera and “telenovelas” entertainment
industries are other
interesting examples of how culture and
ideology and "lifestyle models" are proposed or shaped
in certain ways and for certain ends and not others. Additional relevant articles easily can
be
found using the Google search
engine.
“Military-Media Industrial Complex: here;
and
“The Main Academic Theories of international
But there are a number of more specific ones in addition to the main
three “traditions” (realism,
liberalism and “radicalism”) and their sub-schools
which are identified in the article, such as
“the clash of civilizations” notion, or how to interpret Iran or Israel or Syria or Africa or
Latin America or China (e.g. " "the pivot to Asia") or most other significant
world situations
and contexts, and which together can have a
profound influence on how the world is
understood and thus approached and dealt with by various "players". Are
academia, large
universities and government and business thinking “independently”
of one another? And are
they each also thinking "independently" of the mainstream paradigm? Or ARE they (together)
the mainstream paradigm? And where is the "mainstream paradigm" leading us to?
And one other
very important component of the Ideology and Culture complex which also
contributes to the “mainstream paradigm” is the “Religions Complex”:
xi)
The” Religions Complex” encompasses the many
relationships and influences and interactions of the main world religions -or
the trans-cultural and international faiths-, the indigenous religions, and the
new religious movements that may exist and operate in a given society -and
their respective institutions and organizations- to national and local and international politics, culture,
economics and business; What is
religion can be found here
. The main religious groups
here
. The interconnections between politics and religion around the globe is a vast
subject; a basic outline of topics
is here . The critical role of religions in global politics and in the
practice of international
relations and international affairs is here . The influence of the religious right in the U.S. is here and of the Israeli lobby, it is here. The massive secret Vatican archives, why are
they secret?, is here . The Roman Catholic church, population, and
the Republican party in the U.S. here . Reflections on caste and class, hierarchy
and dominance in India here . Islamic “principlism” in Iran here . Islam in Saudi Arabia here .
Ultraorhodox jews pose challenges in Israel, here . Buddhism and politics in south-east Asia, here . Sex, ideology, religion, 10 myths about
population growth: here
(but the preceding are only a small sample of the information available on the
“Religions Complex” and its main interactions and influences on all areas of
national and global society)
7)
The Tobacco industry Complex is just one example among many other
such examples for a large number of "lesser" industries and is described here And another such
industry is retailing and merchandising as exemplified by Walmart. See
for instance this article which was just published: here
And one final additional “lesser” industry (which in fact is not “lesser” at all) which must
be mentioned in a post such as this concerned with what major
industry-government-state-media-plus-other-actors “complexes” are doing to: a) prevent progress in addressing climate change and
limits to growth and their derivative environmental issues while at the same
time b) severely aggravating those same issues directly and indirectly, is the mining and mineral extraction
industry. Some of the
largest mining companies that can be counted within this Complex are as
follows: BHP
Billiton, Vale, Rio Tinto, Shenhua, AngloAmerican, Suncor, Xstrata, Barrick,
Freeport Mc Moran; They are active
on every continent. The entire top 100 instead
can be viewed here For how they and other lesser
“junior mining” companies are “plundering the planet” please see here
and here
. The serious problems with the
extractive industries sector in Africa are discussed here
. The political economy and
historical role of “extractivism” is discussed: here . And the new Chinese neo-colonialism operating in Africa is
discussed here . Are such complexes operating only in
“corrupt Africa”? What about right
in the European Union in Sweden and in Finland “under the northern lights”? Please see the video:
here .
The above are the seven major complexes (the last one, number 7, includes only a few examples for "other industries") which exist in the
United States and throughout the Western nations (but also China and Russia) and in the “developing” countries
where their related industries and governments operate either “through” the
complexes which exist in the United States, and/or also through additional complementary
or supplementary “domestic or indigenous” complexes. For instance Britain and France each have their own
military industrial complex (and Italy and Belgium have lesser ones) but these are closely tied to and interact with
(and often cooperate with) the U.S. Military Industrial Complex. These military-industrial complexes also market and
sell military equipment and systems to developing nations and of course have government "partners" there.
A similar or at least a closely related modus operandi could be described for the major oil companies of the Fossil Fuels Complex e.g. Exxon Mobil, Chevron, B.P, Shell,
Total, E.N.I., and in different ways the large state-owned companies such as Saudi
Aramco, Gazprom, Petrochina, Pemex, Petrobras and several others and their relationship to lesser oil companies and to oil industry contractors. (e.g. Halliburton and many others)
At a higher order level the seven
complexes also cooperate and collude with one another. And when I say “collude” this does not
mean there is always a so called “conspiracy” though in some instances there
is. Collusion (and also
self-censorship and other related phenomena of collusion) and particularly when it has been
perfected and established as an overall system- happens “naturally and seamlessly and
automatically”.
For example, the “petrodollar system” article listed
under the Finance and Banking complex links above illustrates this for the Military
Industrial Complex, the Finance and Banking Complex, and the Fossil Fuels
Complex; that is, the fossil fuel complex “produces” oil (i.e. extracts the non-renewable resource called petroleum) in or with the petro-monarchy states of the "Middle East" which is then sold and
traded in dollars (the Wall Street firms make outsized profits on the oil
futures markets) and then the
petro-monarchies States purchase military hardware and systems from the
military industrial complex (and are provided further military “protection”
from the United States) so that in fact the three complexes work together in
unison or in some respects as one single larger complex “recycling
petrodollars” while also implementing the desired geopolitics and geo/regional
policies to achieve the desired outcomes. (though there are also many “unintended” consequences) (such
as hundreds of thousands of people or more getting killed in various countries and entire countries and societies being wrecked)
And so do some of the other
complexes listed above similarly collude and cooperate as whole complexes with one another albeit in different groupings and combinations and for
different though ultimately also related purposes.
Another way to view the overall
functioning of these complexes is provided by the following two links:
In fact the first link above shows
the main elements of all the seven complexes on one single diagram and suggests
that they work together as an overall “network” which as a result is also
extremely resilient. It is a
very useful visual depiction.
The second link instead provides
a more conceptual article that places all the complexes into one single
theoretical / analytical framework.
Both articles / links were written with the U.S. in mind but I believe
they apply equally well with due adaptations to other Western (and Eastern) (e.g.
Japan, Australia but also China) countries as well.
Fundamentally I believe the
reasons why so little has been accomplished -which can be considered effective
and of a scope and nature commensurate to the problem – to tackle Climate
Change and the wide range of (extremely serious) environmental and social
problems that derive from Limits to Growth on a finite planet, are all traceable to one or more of
these “power Complexes” and the ways they condition, shape and determine national
and international public policies and also the corporate policies and agendas which
can be implemented, and the ones which cannot be. Or at least cannot be implemented for the time being; and in this respect please also note the
latest failure of the U.N. sponsored climate change talks just held in Warsaw
and some of the more apparent and less apparent causes for this failure.
A particularly good and specific
and detailed description of the “nuts and bolts” of how one of the complexes
works is provided by T.C. Colin Campbell in his book “Whole: Rethinking the
Science of Nutrition” which I have mentioned above under the “dual”
Agro-Industry & Food and the Pharmaceutical & Medical Complex. The author has lived and experienced (as
a serious and committed scientist) the various components of that particular
complex from the inside out and from the outside in over the past 50 years while
playing various professional and policy advisory roles.
In my opinion it is a book well
worth reading in its entirety not only because it identifies a good path to
improved personal individual health but also because it explains extremely well
how ONE of the Complexes works.
Together with the illustrations provided for the other Complexes above
it then becomes easy to understand how all of the complexes work at a more
generic level. Naturally just as
for others who have exposed the other complexes plenty of propaganda has been
done by those with vested interests against the book (Whole: Rethinking the Science of Nutrition) and
its author (T.C. Colin Campbell) as well as against its nutritional recommendations. Similar propaganda has been done by the
fossil fuel complex against renewable energies and their various proponents as
well as against climate science and climate scientists.
The other six Complexes work in
similar ways and are well-illustrated and described at the other links I have provided
above. The implications for climate
change and for humanity’s inability thus far to come to grips with it -as well
as with not coming to grips with the many other Limits to Growth problems- (peak
resources both renewable and non-renewable, various types of environmental
degradation, pollution, toxicity and etc.) seem clear to me. Perhaps by reading some of the
links above they also can become clearer and sharper and more focused to others
reading this post; and if so I will have accomplished my purpose for writing
it.
How to try to overcome
practically the negative influences of the Complexes is however well beyond the
scope of this post and unfortunately also beyond the scope of my own
intellectual capacity more generally. (though I have some ideas that I may try to articulate
later) For those interested in what I
think about all of that in more general terms right now, please also see another recent post of
mine on this same blog by the title “Has Humanity Missed its Appointment with
History?”
In that post I explain why I
believe humanity has probably indeed missed its appointment with what the
famous French historian Fernand Braudel calls “long term history”. And in short this is because humanity
has not been able to develop effective world governance and a common cosmopolitan
identity in time to be able to act in a concerted and effective manner to deal
with problems of the Global Commons. The problems arose probably at least two or three centuries
before we were institutionally and mentally, or “identity-wise”, ready to face them and handle them
properly.
Said another way,
we should have started facing our institutional (both macro and micro) and common
identity weaknesses and divisions earlier so that we now could be ready and on
time for our “appointment with history”.
An appointment, moreover, which we ourselves “scheduled” by: i) growing our population from 1
billion in 1800 to 7.1 billions today; ii) becoming dependent on and using
staggering quantities of fossil fuels and producing extraordinary amounts of CO2 emissions; iii) also augmenting both our overall GDP as
well as our GDP per capita enormously since 1800 and iv) using staggering
amounts of both renewable and non-renewable resources and generally degrading
and polluting the planet’s biosphere and its land, water and air principal components. This assault on the
biosphere clearly could not go on “forever” and we would have to change our
ways at some point. So it would
have been much better to prepare ourselves far better and far earlier in order
to do so.
The Seven Complexes above instead
explain why humanity is STILL missing its “appointment” with the more current “historical
period” -for what Fernand Braudel calls “the history of periods” - and in this
instance just the past 50 to 100 years.
A period during which the seven complexes have either arisen or extended
or developed or consolidated themselves further worldwide, thereby making it nearly impossible for
humanity to implement what now would be only a partial and less complete and
less thorough and also highly belated concerted and effective preventive or
mitigating or remedial actions effort, on climate change and Limits to Growth - related issues. And the emergence, development and
consolidation of the seven complexes in this latest “historical period” during
the course of “long term history” is
also in keeping with, and has occurred in tandem with, the growth and extension of the overall
“globalized neoliberal free market capitalism” order, which has its own history of
political, economic, cultural and institutional development(s).
The link to Fernand Braudel’s
monumental “The History of Civilizations” is here
And the links to my own earlier
posts both in Italian version and in English version about humanity’s missed
appointment with (long term) history are here in
Italian, and the English version is
in fact the previous post which was posted recently on this same blog.
I read as far as #6. This is counter-productive and an insult to people of faith. It is true that many people of faith and their organizations have done and are doing much harm, lumping them all together is short-sighted and helps not a whit. It also demonstrates poor judgment. When I was young I was active in the US Civil Rights movement, which was largely based in communities of faith. Environmentalism is weaker than it should be because of the limited participation by these communities.
ReplyDeleteProf Bardi, I am severely disappointed in your publishing such insolence. I expect far better from a fan of archery, the fine arts and the Classics.
David F Collins
Sorry that you found this post offensive, David. I think that Max had no intention of insulting believers, just organized religions; and that's something very different.
DeleteYour reply was accurate Ugo. Not only did I not have any intention of insulting "believers" I also never have any intention of insulting anyone, only of saying what I happen to think is accurate and factual and "allowing" (if it were for me to allow it) anyone else to think and say whatever it is which they in turn honestly think in reply and in particular if it responds to the substance of what is at issue. But I wonder whether for the writer of the comment it might not have been far better for you -as a fan of "archery, the arts and the classics"- to simply censor such insolent (and heretical?) views.
DeletePull out the ideology of nationalism from under the proposed edifice of power complexes, and the whole thing disintegrates.
ReplyDeleteConsider the radical difference in the conduct on the paramount climate issue of EU politicains and corporations compared with their US counterparts. Capitalism - whether state or corporate - is not the core of the problem. Given that we have only a decade or so before the probable onset of serial global crop failures, to have any chance of meeting our appointment with history it is surely time that we applied some careful analysis of just what obstructs the necessary codification of just international law.
Regards,
Lewis
Both the ideology of nationalism -but also the political and economic systems and institutions of nation states which are inseparable from it, are an integral part of each of the complexes. This is explained at the outset of the post. I disagree that capitalism and its "economic growth forever" model are not at the core of the problem. But it is a valid subject for discussion. And it would be very good also to hear what careful analyses -and more importantly what careful set of actions and initiatives that actually can and will be implemented-, can be deployed over the next decade or so, so that we can meet our appointment with history and remove the "obstructions to the necessary codification of just international law" -but more importantly I also would add- the obstructions to just international practice and to the practical application of actual principles of universal justice. Regarding "the radical difference" in the conduct of EU politicians and corporations and those of their U.S. counterparts I think this is a valid subject for careful investigation. Studies can and should be be conducted with methods subject to the standard criteria of scientific investigation to determine statements, intentions, actions, effects, outcomes and impacts. If the Europeans are then demonstrated to be doing so much better than the Americans then surely the Americans could learn something from them. Similarly anyone can learn from the experience and good practices of others. Personally I don't see what needs to happen happening in the next 10, 20 or 30 years during which I think it needs to happen. And in the post above I have stated what I think are the major obstacles.
Delete